Showing posts with label SaaS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SaaS. Show all posts

Sunday, 31 January 2016

Oracle kills Java browser plug-in

Image result for Oracle is finally killing the Java browser plug-in



Oracle said that it will finally kill its Java browser plug-in. This move does not come as soon as possible — in the past years, the Java browser plug-in was a easy target for hackers and malware authors. A 2014 report from Cisco said that a whopping 91% of all attacks were targeted at Java.

The situation has improved afterwards ; Cisco’s mid-year 2015 report revealed that for sometime Java was a serious course for concern,the company had made strides on mitigating its attack profile and enhancing total security. As of last year, attacks against Flash were increasing alarmingly, while that of Java declined overall.

Even after these improvements, Oracle is still scaling down the Java plug in when it releases Java 9, and removing it totally at some point after that date. Both Edge and Chrome have already nuked browser support for Java from orbit; Firefox announced plans to do so late last year. Historically, Oracle has been slow to respond to vulnerabilities in Java, and its sandboxing was never as foolproof as the company advertised.

Oracle’s stated reasons for killing the browser plug-ins doesn’t mention the broken sandbox model or the lack of an automatic security update process. Instead, it reads:

As Java evolved to become one of the leading mainstream development platforms, so did the applet’s hosts – the web browsers. The rise of web usage on mobile device browsers, typically without support for plugins, increasingly led browser makers to want to restrict and remove standards based plug in support from their products, as they tried to combine the set of features available across desktop and mobile versions. The Oracle JRE can only support applets on browsers for as long as browser vendors provide the requisite cross-browser standards based plugin API (e.g. NPAPI) support.

In other words, Java was a cool, cutting-edge technology, until pesky browser companies decided to kill it.

If you don’t specifically need Java, we recommend uninstalling it. It’s the kind of application that you’ll know if you need (and won’t miss, if you don’t). IE11 still supports Java from within the browser if you need to use it, but Chrome has phased it out and Mozilla is in the process of doing so. Oracle’s migration document suggests that firms which rely on Java’s browser plug-ins should begin investigating “plug-in-free alternatives.”

Computer security is, by its nature, a moving target. Every now and then, however, Team White Hat scores a genuine victory. With Adobe Flash rapidly fading and Java plug-ins facing a near-term expiration date, the Internet should be genuinely safer — at least, for a little while.


Sunday, 3 January 2016

10 Companies Who Tried to Wrestle with Google & Lost Out

The Mammoth that is Google has grown to enormous proportions. Some ambitious companies have tried to topple them and have seriously failed. Here are 10 such fallen Hunters.

1. WOLFRAM ALPHA



Well, they never tried to compete with Google in the total search space but in computational knowledge (which is a big part of what people search on Google). Google fired back with their Google Squared application. From being a hot cake several months ago, Wolfram Alpha is slowly dying off.
Situation: Still in existence

2. CUIL




Cuil was also being promoted as a "Google crusher" but in real life, it wasn't anywhere near it. They boasted an index size of several billions pages…so what? We don't need quantity, we need quality.
Anyhow, several days later, Google came up with a bold statement that they had indexed around a trillion pages which seriously overshadowed the Cuil claim and deprived people of the only reason they had of using it.
Situation: Still in existence

3. MICROSOFT LIVE SEARCH




Microsoft’s sick old search engine that predated Bing, nobody really used Live Search. Its market share seriously declined till the launch of Bing, although we still don't know whether Bing’s increasing market share is because of a temporary trend or because people have started to prefer Bing over Google. Bing is features in this list of people search engines by the way and seems really good for finding people.
Situation: Dead

4. WIKIA SEARCH




Wikia was launched by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales in attempt to use human collaboration to create better search results. The idea failed miserably and after 2 years, Wales gave it up.
Situation: Dead

5. ALLTHEWEB




AllTheWeb was about specialized searches and displaying real-time news (a feature that Google at that time was struggling with). But that was back in 2002. In 2010, AllTheWeb receives 10000 times less visitors than Google and all you see in its search results are sponsored ads at the top and ordinary results after that. Another failure.
Situation: Still in existence

6. ASK.COM



Back in 2008, news spread that Ask.com is the 'upcoming Google alternative'. The owners said that Ask is 'more responsive' than Google, in addition to other similar claims. However, just optimism and enthusiasm gets you nowhere on the internet and today, Ask.com has taken another (more realistic) route of being specifically a Q&A type of search engine.
Situation: Still in existence

7. POWERSET



Powerset was launched back in 2008 as a service that used Wikipedia and Freebase as search sources. Unfortunately, nothing changed after that and its search capabilities remain very limited. One of the major reasons behind its failure might have been its speedy acquisition by Microsoft soon after it was launched, which meant that perhaps Microsoft was more focused on developing LiveSearch and then Bing, than focus on 2 projects at the same time.
Situation: Still in existence

8. MYLIVESEARCH



Nobody really knows what happened to them. There was a big buzz about MyLiveSearch back in 2007. Their promise was to search the entire web in real time and not build an index like Google. After the launch of the beta, the feedback wasn't so positive and from then on, it seems to have gotten stuck in an eternal “development stage”. So I'll mark their status as dead.
Situation: Dead

9. YAHOO SEARCH


The mighty has officially fallen and is now powered by Bing search results. Yahoo, although still a huge company, also got punched by Google in the search engine arena.
Situation: Dead

10. YAUBA



Yauba tried to exploit one of Google’s weaknesses, which is supposedly privacy. They launched as a 'privacy safe 'search engine, but to put it simply, their search results sucked. Yauba still exists but is barely surviving.
 Situation: Still in existence